Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review. 5 months with no change in status.

Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review Awaiting Reviewer Scores. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. Articles passing successfully through the pre-refereeing stage then begin formal peer review. This process continues until The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review, awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision How much should I help, awaiting reviewer scores vs under review. I have naturally seen the status "under review" when the manuscript goes to the process review for others journals. Okay, it has been sent for review again. Reviewer assignments (i. Now, 12 hours later, it's reading Awaiting ME Decision plus Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. Doing so is considered a breach of They can perform any number of tasks depending on the journals specific workflow, including finding and managing the review process, making recommendations and/or decisions. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Some reviewers will As a reviewer, you are obligated to maintain the confidentiality of both the paper you are reviewing and also of your review. I submitted a paper on ScholarOne this morning. Not sure if the The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. Then, the status remained unchanged for three weeks. This refers to the internal check by the journal, for basic aspects such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, scope match, and adherence to the journal I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. When should you say “yes” and when should you I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". AE stands for "Associate Editor. Reviewer A and the TE had slightly sharp comments. Is this common in scientific journals? I submitted others manuscripts to other journals and the review process was different. The latter is a clear term that means reviewers have agreed to review the article, but have not provided a report yet. I sent a manuscript almost 1 month ago to a journal and the status was changed to " awaiting approval" without under review. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. Answer: The term "Awaiting Reviewer" means that the Editor has sent invitations to two or more reviewers for reviewing your manuscript but the Editor has still not received any response from them. Will wait for the result. " Once the reviewer accepts the invitation, the status will change to "Under review" once again. Awaiting Reviewer Score(s) in ScholarOne. The manuscript status was first displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. It may be set to required or optional for the Reviewer to answer. What does it mean that You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Skip to main content Ask a Question. Mental Health then the EIC would be the one to evaluate the manuscript. Some reviewers will ask for a longer period of time; if the request is reasonable, please grant it. What does this mean? Does it imply a desk reject? Assign Reviewers; Awaiting Reviewer Scores; Overdue Reviewer Scores; AE Make Recommendation; Overdue Tasks. 10 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 45b2. Visit Stack Exchange. TMI’s average turnaround time, from initial submission to decision, is about 7-weeks. On the last step I’ve seen it stay for months because some DEs are sitting on the paper. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). Still the status is same. Download . " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". For instance, if ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ happened earlier, it may mean the AE first decided to refer their decision to the EIC, but changed their mind, and then decided to send it for review. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting In an ideal world, enough of the invited reviewers will agree to review and your manuscript will move on to the next stage. Whats the difference? Just had a manuscript make this change. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. IEEE Policy on Reviewers Using AI: Information or content contained in or about a manuscript under review shall not be processed through a public platform (directly or indirectly) for AI generation of text for a review. But today suddenly the status changed back to I submitted a paper to some journal. e. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. The ‘Completed’ field indicates that the ‘Thank you for submitting your review’ e-mail should send when the reviewer has returned their review, therefore completed the Reviewer Score task. Upon submission, Editors will assess the general suitability of your paper for the It has been six months and it is still "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. Under review means the AE has it but it is not yet sent out for reviewer scores. The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Pending", and recently, maybe 4 days ago, the status has changed to "Decision Pending Approval". For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Please let me know the decision you have received. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. Is that the only reason the date changes? I have heard that if the editor accesses the reviewers coments and when a reviewer send his comments the date changes also. 10 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Giod! Economist acf3 ^ Thanks. Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that it has been sent out for peer review and peer reviewers are in the process of reviewing the paper. Typically, these are the statuses, respectively, for when the paper is in peer review (‘Awaiting reviewer scores’) and after (‘Revision’). After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript and therefore takes time. MS > JFE 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Reply. Follow answered Jun 18, 2012 at 2:47. What does this mean? Does it imply a desk reject? Meaning of double statuses Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor Meaning of ‘Awaiting reviewer scores’ This status is known by different names with different journals, including ‘Under review’ and ‘Awaiting technical scores. I recently submitted a manuscript to a reputed computer science (CS) journal that follows the ScholarOne workflow system. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. How long I should wait for the final I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. The paper received an R&R last summer and a revised version was provided. If ‘Awaiting EIC Decision’ is taking too long, is that a good sign or a bad sign? It’s not entirely clear by your query whether these were the statuses before you submitted the revised paper or after. If you have reviewed other articles for this publication in the past, the timeliness and quality of Note: See the Publons Credit for Completed Reviews section for information about how to add previously completed reviews to your Publons record. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor will have to look for new reviewers and send out invitations all over again. My paper underwent a revision. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Under review means the AE is currently evaluating whether the paper is worth sending out for review. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. Jim Jim. What can this mean? The platform is The ‘Overdue’ field will trigger the ‘Reviewer Scores now due’ e-mail to send on the day the review is due. How long I should wait for the final verdict? The handling editor considers all the returned reviews before making a decision. Sometimes, the editor, after going I submitted my paper to one of the IEEE Transactions journals. I have a paper that was under review with one of Wiley's journals. It seems that the Associate . 5. Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. Log In/Register. The Decision is Communicated. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Probably a desk reject from the AE that may have been slowed due to holidays. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. If the reviewers respond that they will review your manuscript, the status will change to "Under Review". Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. However, I just noticed that the status of my Awaiting Reviewer Score(s) in ScholarOne. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. But today suddenly the status changed back to Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. " I am not able to understand the status of my paper. So, the reviewers will share their comments with the Associate Editor (AE) along with their recommendations for the paper – whether (or not) they believe the paper has merit and should therefore be considered I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using the ScholarOne system. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. the status is changed again (Awaiting Reviewer Scores). Meaning of an immediate change (after submission) to Awaiting AE Recommendation. There have been no replies for the second and third times. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. If that is the case, I submitted a paper to some journal. If the status is listed as Under Review it may still be desk rejected, but if it changes to Awaiting Reviewer Selection or Awaiting Reviewer Scores it has passed desk review, although it can still then be rejected on the basis of reviewer reports. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". I'm curious if we are still waiting for reviewers to accept the review of the manuscript, like Awaiting Reviewer Invitation, or it's However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor will have to look for new reviewers and send out invitations all over again. Improve this question. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. Next, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation and remained so for a week. . (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (Awaiting I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting Reviewer Scores This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. xml Templates Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. 4k 10 10 gold badges 76 76 silver badges 129 129 bronze badges. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory; The system only updated to 'Under Review' when two reviewers have BOTH accepted to review the paper. So, keep up your hope and wait for the status to change to "Under review. So, if you mean these are the statuses after submitting the revised paper After ten more days i. It means its under review. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. In reality, however, it is quite normal for invited I submitted a paper to a journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. Journals refer to this role as many things depending on their business model. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. If the Reviewer is logged in, it will Our entire research enterprise would stop functioning without Reviewers. If you didn't see "under review", then the editor is making a decision without consulting reviewers, which is usually a bad sign. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. IEEE Access has a typical acceptance rate of about 30%, which is On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does Becoming a Peer Reviewer; Career Advice for researchers; Mental Health. (Non-paper What does awaiting reviewers reply mean? And how long does it take. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. Under Review and Under consider: Under Review is Recruiting is reviewing your application and under consideration is the next step with the manager of Stages of Peer Review Stages of Peer Review from Submission to Accept/Reject Decision. @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. However, the I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. However, sometimes, the AE is not satisfied with the reviews and feels the need for an additional review. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. IEEE Access has a typical acceptance rate of about 30%, which is A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same day it changed back to "Under Review". I noticed that the status of my paper changed immediately to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ without being ‘Under Review. The status of the paper changed several times. Also, ‘SAE’ perhaps stands for ‘Specialist Associate Editor. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. But the editor, for some reason, e. e around two months from the submission date, I got a mail stating "I have received all the required reviews, which I will now evaluate before making a decision" and the status changed to "Ready for Decision". I have sent three emails to the editor, and the first time, the editor gave a vague reply, saying that it is still under review and we have to wait. This subreddit is for all those interested in working for the United States federal government. What does this mean? Reviews were completed and back to the Editor? 10 years ago # QUOTE 2 Good 0 No Giod! Economist b1cc. Mega Nav. Research papers and reviews submitted for publication in the majority of IOP journals are sent to two independent referees who are asked to report on the quality, scientific rigour, novelty, significance to the field, and presentation. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. IEEE Access strives to maintain an expedited peer review process of only 4 to 6 weeks, however, all article submissions still undergo a thorough peer review process to ensure only high-quality articles are published. When you review a paper you read a manuscript critically, and start to realize potential criticisms reviewers might have of your future papers. The number next to each status queue title These are relatively simple. In my opinion, this is probably what has happened to your paper, which is why the status has changed to "Awaiting reviewer invitation. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. 33. Your paper is evaluated by expert peers in the field, known as referees, with a publication decision made by the journal editors. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". It took 10 days to go from Under Review to Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Associate ORCID iD The Score Sheet may now be configured to ask for the Reviewer’s ORCID iD. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. It means it is under review by another Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. From a purely grammatical perspective there’s not much difference between the two terms. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Peer Review in Progress. Add a • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to Awaiting AE Decision". 26, awaiting reviewer scores. After two more days the status changed to "Under Review. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". Also, It has been 1. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". This is why Antonin Scalia's death was such a great loss, who is left to tell people to just read the goddamn words. ’ What this means is that your manuscript has been sent for peer review and the peer review comments/opinions are presently awaited. Meaning of awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. It's not necessarily the same as 'under review' and 'awaiting reviewer scores'. After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. ’ This must be a journal I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Awaiting Editor Decision Under review --> some journals seem to use this for every stage of peer review. Please note that other statuses may fall under this umbrella, such as "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Now, this status has remained for 18 days. I'm relatively new to publishing and I get I'm probably overthinking this. “Awaiting SE Recommendation” means that it went to a Section Editor (SE) of the journal for checking the match with that section of the journal. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". ’ It is a little odd that the latter statuses are taking longer. " Good luck! Answered by Editage This is quite simple. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Don't mean to be mean, but you are probably overthinking this. I've recently contacted the editor about the status of the manuscript on 8-Apr-2019 and he replied that he is waiting for an overdue review, the the reviewer wa chased on 5-Apr-2019. ’ Just a few hours later, another ADM was assigned, but the status is the same. I didnt see the "under review Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: One uses under review when the purpose is to critically scrutinize events- for example to find fault or establish innocence. AE Overdue Tasks; Reviewer Overdue Score; Overdue Reviewer Response ; Long-Standing Papers; You can access manuscripts in each peer review status by clicking on the status queue title. The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. 15-6. Really? I don't think so. g. I’m not able to meet my supervisor at the moment as they are away. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. Loading Tour The journal uses ScholarOne Manuscripts for online submission. Now it is almost 3 weeks. Can you confirm? Edit: in my case, it is for a revised paper. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned 2023. It seems to me that the processing at all levels My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". awaiting AE decision, then Awaiting DE decision. It means that the peer review is over, taking about two months, and the peer reviewer recommendations are awaited on the paper. " This status has not been changed for a month. So what is the status if it is sent to referees? 4 years ago # QUOTE 3 Good 0 No Giod! Economist I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed Relatedly, does under review mean that the AE has sent to referees or just that AE has been assigned? As I recall, it switches to showing Awaiting reviewer scores, the. The former is a vague term that could mean anything: reviewer has been invited, I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. The first update, ADM: [a person’s name], means that the manuscript was first in administrative (shortened to ‘ADM’) processing, which is the typical first stage after submission. So based on what you say, and I hope I'm wrong, but it looks like For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Answered August 14, 2017 - Outreach Specialist (Former Employee) - Telehealth Solutions. What does this status mean? I submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal. However, I definitely remember the last two: Awaiting reviewer scores. Yesterday I checked the paper and the status had changed to “awaiting final decision”. For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. Post Send Post » Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. After ten more days i. ’ After a week, it changed to ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment. Economist acf3. Role of the journal editor. Gain privileged insight into state-of-the-art in research, and have a say in what is published and what is rejected. Related reading: What does a change from "awaiting editorial decision" back to "under review" mean? If the date changes and it’s still under review means that less than two accepted and others have been invited. Stack Exchange Network . When you submit a research manuscript for peer review, the journal may report the status of the review as “in review” or “under review”. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. 9. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. I think so. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? publications; peer-review; journal-workflow; Share. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. Role of the Editor . Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. 9 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Reply. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. 我可以肯定的是不一样: 我曾经投稿Oxford press期刊, 先是under review,经过一月有余,变为Awaiting Reviewer Scores ,然后很快(4天后)给出审稿意见. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". --我的理解是: under review是审稿的前面阶段, Awaiting Reviewer Scores 是审稿的后面阶段,表示审稿即将结束. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. ’ Please help me understand these status changes. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. If the initial reviews are conflicting, the Action Editor may occasionally decide to approach an additional reviewer. You have been invited to review this article based on your knowledge and expertise. Now, the status is Awaiting EIC Decision. You are invited to be one of at least two independent, qualified reviewers who will evaluate this article. Thanks though. But I don't think that's the right way of thinking about it. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Thanks. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. If you can, be on hand to talk through the piece of homework. What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Does anyone have any idea why In MS, what is the difference between "Under Review" and "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" after going through "Awaiting AE Assignment"? 1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 0dda. However, a strange observation is that I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the review. If this Under Review Awaiting Reviewer Scores Awaiting TE Recommendation Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting SE Recommendation Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting EIC Decision Reject && Resubmit Reviewer Comments: There were a total of 35 comments from four reviewers and the Technical Editor (TE). My manuscript status changed from ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation,’ but the same day, it went back to ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores. If your manuscript is at this stage, then enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate it and we just need to wait for the reviewers to return their comments so that a decision can be taken. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. What does this mean? Will it go for review? However, in this case, “Under Review” means that the paper was picked up for an initial review of the quality of the paper and of a match with the journal’s scope. Under Review and Under consider: Under Review is Recruiting is reviewing your application and under consideration is the next step with the manager of Since the reviews have come in, the AE should ideally not take too long to give his recommendation. 6. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. The status has been changed to Awaiting Reviewer Scores in the same week I created the submission. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. Decision made – notification imminent: The Action Editor has Meaning of the Under Review status in the ScholarOne system Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. What At this stage, the manuscript is still under review, awaiting the feedback of the reviewer(s). ’ Does this mean that it has not been sent for review? Thank you. The editor sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. But my question is as below. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. I submitted a paper to a journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to get an extra opinion before making a decision. Then there is an Editor In Peer review is the process used to assess whether an academic paper is suitable for publication based on the quality, originality and importance of the work. 5 months with no change in status. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. 10 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Giod! Oh, if that is true then what does "under review" mean? Really? I don't think so. It may be that one journal uses the term “in review” and another the term “under review”, both to signify the same thing: that your Awaiting Reviewer Scores Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. ’ After that, it has been ‘Under Review’ for eight weeks. Share. 2023. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. zhyun 2023-06-08 It may be because there are conflicting opinions in the current review or the editor believes that there Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. t backed up) Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. In case ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ happened earlier, they initially decided to send it for review, but changed their mind, and decided to Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. " Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all peer reviews are completed and have been received by the editorial office. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Please note that other statuses may My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. 6. ’ The following day, it changed back again to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. a) Is it My supervisor and I are currently awaiting the outcome of a paper we submitted a few months ago. Everybody's Job Market Rumors (XJMR) | Job Market Wiki Thread: 0 Goods vs 0 No Goods; Home » Economics » Research / Journals "Under Review" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Economist e7d1. ), Assistant Editor (AE), Section Editors (SE) are a few of the more common ones. What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? If it has been "under review" for some time, then yes - the external reviewers are done. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. It is my very first paper (co-authored) so this process is quite new to me. Also be available to answer questions and explain how to find answers if the question has stumped you. Yes, but the question is under review by whom. Since the application process itself is often nothing short of herculean and time-consuming to boot, this place is meant to serve as a I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Answered August 14, 2017 - Outreach Specialist (Former Employee) - Telehealth Solutions. What does this mean? Please help. 21, awaiting AE decision. Also, related to one of Marcus' points above, if we have recieved two reviews, the system updates to 'Reviews Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will change to "under review. The editor decides whether your paper fits the aims and scope of the journal, then select the reviewers I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. Immediately after submission, one ADM was assigned, but MAL ADM (an abbreviation that is not known to me) was not assigned, and the status was ‘Under review. Most likely this doesn't reflect positive response, if it changed directly from under review or awaiting reviewers score to awaiting editor decision. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. I My paper has been on second round of revision (R&R) with this journal for 4 months, when I sent an email to ask for what is going on, I just saw the status changed from awaiting reviewer scores to reviewer selection under way. If it is sent out to reviewers, then the status changes to Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Everybody's Job Market Rumors (XJMR) | Job Market Wiki Stages of Peer Review Stages of Peer Review from Submission to Accept/Reject Decision. Editors (Ed. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, I submitted a paper on ScholarOne this morning. Skip to main content. Improve this answer. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. xitih waoy pja qtxta zeyc bttgoug jaex rlkxw anfdr jyomiok